Evomi Alternative
An Evomi alternative with far deeper coverage. Our five country benchmark found Shifter serving between 2.5 and 8.4 times more live residential IPs than Evomi, from $0.75/GB against their $2.20 floor.
Trusted by 50,000+ clients worldwide
Feature-by-feature comparison
| Feature | Shifter | Evomi |
|---|---|---|
| Live IPs measured (US) | 212,212 | 25,320 |
| Live IPs measured (UK) | 60,487 | 15,139 |
| Live IPs measured (Germany) | 22,428 | 8,999 |
| Starting Price | $2.00/GB | $3.75/GB (8 GB plan) |
| Best Price | $0.75/GB | $2.20/GB at 5 TB |
| Protocols | HTTP / HTTPS / SOCKS5 | HTTP / HTTPS / SOCKS5 |
| Geo-Targeting | City-level (195+ countries) | Country, region and city |
| IP Rotation | Per-request + Sticky sessions | Per-request + Sticky sessions |
| Pay As You Go | Not offered | $4.00/GB |
| Customer Support | 24/7 on all plans | 24/7 chat |
Pricing Comparison (per GB)
| Volume | ShifterUp to 71% OFF | Evomi | You Save |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $10 for 5 GB ($2.00/GB) | $30 for 8 GB ($3.75/GB) | 67% |
| Mid-Volume (~100 GB) | $100 ($1.00/GB) | $320 ($3.20/GB) | 69% |
| Scale (250 GB+) | $187 ($0.75/GB) | $750 ($3.00/GB) | 75% |
| Best Rate | $0.75/GB from 200 GB | $2.20/GB at 5 TB | 66% |
We counted the live residential IPs Shifter and Evomi each served across five countries, under an identical test. See the numbers and the method.
Our full write-up of Evomi: what the pool, pricing and gateway behaviour add up to, scored on the same rubric as every network we tested.
Why use Shifter residential proxies?
Between 2.5 and 8.4 Times More Live IPs
Evomi returned the smallest live pool of any provider in our benchmark. Shifter served 8.4 times more addresses in the United States, 4 times more in the United Kingdom and 2.5 times more in Germany.
Cheaper at Every Tier, Not Just at Scale
Evomi's entry plan is $3.75/GB and its floor is $2.20 on a 5 TB commitment. Shifter starts at $2.00 and reaches $0.75 from 200 GB, so the saving runs from roughly 47% at entry to 66% at scale.
Broader Network Spread
Shifter's addresses came from more autonomous systems in every country tested, over four times as many in France. A pool concentrated on few networks is easier for anti-bot systems to recognise and block as a group.
Coverage Where Small Pools Struggle
Evomi held up best in Canada and Germany and weakest in the United States, where Shifter served 212,212 live IPs against its 25,320. If your work is US heavy, that gap is the whole decision.
Reliability Held Up on Both Sides
The difference between the two networks here is coverage and price, not stability.
Simple, transparent pricing
Fixed monthly plans with included bandwidth. No hidden fees. Scale as your usage grows.
Buy one, get one free.
Second month is free, with full traffic included.
Frequently asked questions
Common questions about switching from Evomi to Shifter.
In our benchmark, with Shifter re-measured on 7 October 2026, 8.4 times larger in the United States, 4 times in the United Kingdom, 3.3 times in France and 2.5 times in both Canada and Germany. Full method and tables are at /benchmark/evomi.
Its run was clean and consistent across all five countries. If steady, predictable behaviour matters more to you than pool depth or price, that is a fair reason to consider it.
Roughly 47% at entry volume, 69% around 100 GB a month and 66% at each provider's best published rate. Evomi's cheapest rate also requires a 5 TB commitment, where Shifter's applies from 200 GB.
Because they count IPs that were live and reachable during the test rather than every address a network has ever seen. Residential IPs rotate all day, so both providers touch far more addresses over 24 hours. What limits a crawl is how many are online at once.
Get the coverage your crawl needs
Several times more live residential IPs in every country we measured, at a fraction of the cost per GB. Test both on your own targets and compare.